First NHS efficiency tables expose ‘profligate’ waste

An interesting piece in The Daily Telegraph yesterday, describing evidence from what is described as the first NHS efficiency tables which expose ‘profligate’ waste of money in purchase and procurement.

I guess the same differences arise in disposal costs, once these disposable items have been used.

If that equitable? Some will say that the increased costs of disposal for a small producer, or an inner city establishment demanding 3am pickups or resulting in a hefty congestion zone charge should indeed pay more than do others for whom a routine collection can be far less costly.

That would seem reasonable, except those charges are rarely visible. Though the sector has a few major players and several smaller companies acting largely as a collection and transfer service, there are significant differences in contract prices between providers and indeed from an individual provider depending on location.

Should there be a standard UK charge for disposal?

Should there be a single UK provider?

Would that help, or hinder, the NHS and other providers? Logically, contract prices would be negotiated centrally by a national consortium of NHS Trusts, and savings shared by all.

But, don’t hold your breath!

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.